Contact us anytime to know more - Kuldeep K., Founder & CEO CISIN
Here are a few strategies for improving software security during all phases of SDLC:
- Implement security standards and applications from the beginning, such as vulnerability scanning. This ensures a more secure product.
- Secure production environments by employing security systems and procedures. Conduct periodic security testing, for instance.
- Specific applications that contain sensitive or mission-critical information by using strong authentication.
- Utilize security systems like firewalls, intrusion prevention, and web application firewalls.
What Types Of Applications Do A Modern Organization Need To Secure?
Web Application Security
Web applications are software programs that run on servers connected to the Internet and can be accessed using browsers and clients utilizing them. Web apps must accept connections over insecure networks by their nature; as a result, they expose many vulnerabilities, particularly those critical for business operations or which contain personal information on customers and can become targets for hackers.
API Security
Application Programming Interfaces have grown increasingly influential within modern businesses. APIs form the backbone of microservices and other modern apps, as well as being at the heart of an entire API economy, allowing organizations to access software created by others and share data created by others. Security for APIs has become a top concern.
APIs with security flaws are often to blame for data breaches. They can lead to significant business disruptions and expose sensitive data. APIs possess many vulnerabilities, such as weak authentication, accidental data disclosure, and failure to implement rate-limiting features.
Cloud Native Application Security
Cloud native or microservices applications utilize virtual machines, container platforms, and serverless architecture. Securing these critical applications can be challenging due to all their moving parts and transient components, which frequently change place - making it hard for administrators to monitor a cloud native environment and ensure all details are secured.
Cloud native applications typically set up infrastructure and environments using declarative settings - an approach known as Infrastructure as Code (IaC). Developers are ultimately responsible for all declarative configurations and code; with cloud native environments, decisions must be made during development rather than later in production.
Traditional testing tools may be used to assess cloud native applications, but they're insufficient. Instead, cloud native security tools that can monitor containers, clusters of containers, serverless functions, and provide developers with quick feedback loops are necessary.
Want More Information About Our Services? Talk to Our Consultants!
Application Security Risks
Web Application Security: OWASP Top 10
Threats against software applications abound. The Open Web Application Security Project's (OWASP) Top 10 List comprises those most likely to affect production environments.
Broken Access Control
Access control issues can allow unauthorized individuals and potential threats to gain entry to areas and privileges they shouldn't. Here are some of the most frequently experienced issues:
- Attackers can gain unauthorized entry to user accounts and act as regular or administrator users to gain access.
- The software permits users to perform functions that aren't authorized.
Please fix this problem by implementing access control mechanisms that explicitly define each role and assign specific privileges for them.
Cryptographic Failures
Cryptographic failures may occur when data is inadequately protected in transit or at rest, potentially exposing passwords, credit card numbers, and personal details that should remain hidden. Application security threats pose a real danger, potentially breaching data protection laws such as the EU General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and financial standards like PCI Data Security Standards.
Injection (including XSS and SQL Injection)
Injection vulnerabilities allow threat actors to inject malicious code directly into a web app interpreter. This results in data being compiled and then executed on the server - SQL injection is one of the more prevalent forms.
Find out more about:
- Cross-Site Scripting
- Local file injection (LFI)
- SQL injection (SQLi)
- Cross-Site Request Fraud (CSRF)
Design Insecure
Insecure design refers to application flaws caused by inadequate or absent security controls, applications without basic protection measures against critical threats. You may be able to correct implementation flaws of applications with secure design phase; however, insecure arrangements cannot be remedied through implementation or remediation measures alone.
Security Misconfiguration (Including the XXE)
Lack of hardening security across all components is often responsible for security misconfigurations. Here are some commonly seen examples:
- Configuring cloud services incorrectly
- Installing or activating features that are not required
- Use default passwords and admin accounts.
- XML External Entities vulnerabilities
Vulnerable Components and Older Models
Vulnerable components and outdated software (formerly called "using components that contain known vulnerabilities") include any vulnerability caused by obsolete or unsupported programs you use or build without knowing their inner workings. This issue arises when using or creating applications without understanding all their internal components.
Identification and Authentication Failed
Identification and authentication failure, previously called "broken authenticity," is the cornerstone of identity attacks by employing secure session management with robust authentication/verification features and safeguarding all identities against potential attacks on their identities.
Software and data integrity failures
Infrastructure and code vulnerable to integrity violations are at risk of failing, which may lead to software and data integrity failures during software updates, sensitive information modification, or any CI/CD changes that have not been validated. Unsecured CI/CD systems may lead to unauthorized access and supply chain attacks.
Security Logging Failures and Monitoring
Failures in security logging and monitoring can occur when application weaknesses prevent timely detection and response to security threats, leading to insufficient monitoring and logging (formerly "insufficient logging and archiving"). Monitoring and logging mechanisms are critical in detecting breaches; when they stop functioning correctly, they compromise alerting and forensics systems.
Server-Side Request Forgery
Server-side request forgery vulnerability (SSRF) occurs when Web Application Security does not verify user-entered URLs before retrieving information from external sources. It can affect servers protected by firewalls and network access control lists that do not verify URLs properly.
API Security Risks: OWASP's Top 10
APIs allow communication among software components, and applications use APIs to enable clients outside their system to request services from within them. APIs are susceptible to various threats and vulnerabilities, so OWASP compiled a top ten list of API security risks.
Authorization To Enroll For Broken Object Level.
APIs expose endpoints with object identifiers, creating issues for Level Access Control (LAC). Instead, it would help if you verified object-level authorization before accessing data sources through user inputs.
User Authentication Protocol Is Broken
An improperly implemented authentication mechanism can give malicious actors unauthorized access, enabling attackers to take advantage of any flaw in its implementation or compromise authentication tokens and assume the identity of legitimate users, whether permanent or temporary, thus compromising API security for your application.
Overexposure Of Data
Generic implementations may expose all object properties to security considerations; this usually happens when developers rely on clients to filter data before showing it to users.
Underdeveloped Resources & Time Constraints
APIs typically don't place limits on the resources that users or clients can request; this, however, may adversely impact performance and result in Denial of Service attacks as well as creating authentication vulnerabilities that permit brute-force attacks.
Broken Function Level Authorization
Attackers may take advantage of authorization flaws to gain unauthorized access to resources or administrative privileges, often caused by overly complex access control policies involving hierarchies, roles, groups and the lack of distinction between regular and administrative functions.
Mass Assignment
Mass assignment occurs when client data, such as JSON files, are incorrectly bound with data models without filtering properties based on allowlists - an action that allows attackers to read documents, explore API endpoints or add additional object properties in request payloads.
Security Misconfiguration
Most security misconfigurations are caused by the following:
- Unsecure default configurations
- Configuration modifications or gaps exist with open cloud storage systems.
- HTTP headers were incorrectly configured.
- Permissive Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)
- Avoid Useless HTTP Methods
- Errors that involve sensitive data
Injection Fault
An injection flaw occurs when a query, either SQL or NoSQL, sends untrusted information directly into an interpreter. This data often contains malicious intent to gain unauthorized access or execute unintended commands.
Assets Can Be Mismanaged Inadvertently
APIs typically expose more endpoints than traditional web apps, meaning documentation must remain up-to-date and updated accordingly. Inventorying hosts and API versions can help address deprecated versions and exposed debug endpoints more effectively.
Log And Monitor Ineffectively
Threat actors may escalate attacks when monitoring and logging are inadequate, especially if there is limited or no integration with incident response. This allows malicious actors to remain persistent, pivoting between systems where they extract data or destroy or manipulate it before riding back.
read more: Securing Applications with Cyber Security Best Practices
What is Application Security Testing (ASS)?
Application Security Testing is a practice designed to make applications more resilient against security threats by identifying vulnerabilities and mitigating them. At its origins, Application Security Testing was once conducted manually; today's fast development processes require automation for effective application security testing (AST).
Automation is necessary due to modular enterprise-level software components, open-source components, known vulnerabilities, and threat vectors; most organizations conduct their AST using multiple application security tools for maximum effectiveness.Before testing an application, key considerations must be addressed before conducting the necessary tests.
Before testing your application for security vulnerabilities, here are a few key things to keep in mind:
- Make a list of all of your applications.
- Understanding the implications, business utility, and sensitivities associated with applications is paramount.
- We are starting by testing public-facing systems like mobile and web apps.
How to test
The parameters must first be defined before testing for security vulnerabilities in an application.
- Testing an application from an outsider's perspective (the "black box" approach) can help uncover security issues affecting authenticated users, which could reveal vulnerabilities such as SQL injection or session manipulating attacks. Established testing also offers value in finding security issues affecting authenticated users; certified testing may reveal security flaws that cannot be easily seen via "black box" testing alone.
- Which tools should be used? This means identifying vulnerabilities in source code should be utilized for testing purposes. Furthermore, runtime security analysis tools are recommended.
- Production Testing Vs. Staging - Testing in production can identify security problems that threaten an organization and its customers. At the same time, performance issues may impact it negatively. Staging testing makes remediation faster and simpler.
- Disabling security systems during testing is often recommended for most security tests. You should turn off firewalls, Web Application Firewalls (WAF), and Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS), or at the very least, allowlist IP addresses of testing tools; otherwise, they could impede scanning efforts. In complete penetration tests, however, all means remain active to check applications without being detected by security measures.
- Conduct security testing during off-peak periods to minimize its effect on performance and reliability.
- What to Report - Many security tools produce highly technical reports that are only easily understandable by security experts in the field, making it hard for laypeople to comprehend them. Security teams must extract critical insights from automated reports, then present them to stakeholders engagingly.
- Validation Testing - One essential aspect of security testing involves validating that remediations have been accomplished. Developers cannot simply claim they have completed remediation; you should rerun the test to ensure the vulnerability has been eliminated.
Application Security Testing Types
Three main types of application testing exist:
Black Box Security Testing
Black Box Testing allows the system to be evaluated without access to its internal workings, simulating an attack from outside. Testing tools or testers must perform surveys to discover which methods are being examined and identify vulnerabilities; black box testing alone cannot assess all security vulnerabilities within an application's codebase. Although black box testing provides valuable insight, it cannot test for all its security flaws.
White Box Security Testing
White box testing gives testing systems full access to all internal aspects of an application being tested, from static code analysis (where testing tools directly access source code for analysis) through dynamic testing to explore multiple paths within it using fuzz testing techniques, such as Static Code Analysis. White Box Testing can help identify vulnerabilities within business logic, code quality issues, security misconfigurations, and unsecure coding; static code analysis provides another example.
White-Box Testing should only ever be done under controlled production environments, as all vulnerabilities discovered during testing cannot always be exploited at once! Static code analysis offers access directly into its source code which helps make testing all-inclusive, allowing access to its source code, while dynamic testing provides another option allowing direct access. Unfortunately, all vulnerabilities identified during white-Box tests may never become exploitable in production environments. In contrast, with white Box testing, all vulnerabilities may not be exploitable due to limited production environments. In comparison, this approach is used with white Box Testing.
Gray Box Security Testing
In a gray box test, the system testing an application has limited access to its internals. A tester may receive login credentials to try it as though they were an authenticated application user. Gray box testing helps to understand the level of access privileged users possess and how much damage their accounts could do if compromised; additionally, gray box tests simulate insider attacks or breached networks, providing a balance between black box and white box approaches that are highly effective.
Application Security Tools and Solutions
Web Application Firewall [WAF]
WAF technology monitors HTTP traffic between web applications and the Internet. While WAFs alone don't offer complete protection against all possible attack vectors, their combination with other security tools may provide a comprehensive defense against attacks against different attack vectors.
WAFs, or web application firewalls, provide layer seven defense in the OSI model and help to defend web applications against attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS), forgery, and SQL injection. WAFs (Web Application Firewalls) are reverse proxies that shield servers and web apps from being exposed via the Internet, forcing clients to pass through it before reaching their servers.
Runtime Application Self Protection (RASP)
RASP can detect security flaws that have been exploited, terminating sessions that use them while issuing alerts as active protection measures.
Vulnerability Management
Vulnerability Management is an integral component of application security. This practice involves identifying software vulnerabilities, classifying them, prioritizing them, and mitigating their effects. Vulnerability Management Tools scan your applications for known vulnerabilities like those listed in the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures database (CVE).
These vulnerabilities should then be classified by severity and prioritized for address; prioritizing allows organizations to focus on the most urgent security concerns while final mitigation typically occurs through patch management.
Bill Of Materials Software
Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) is a list of all components comprising software applications, providing transparency into their composition and simplifying vulnerability management. An SBOM may include open-source, proprietary, and library components and modules used in software projects and their respective locations on servers or workstations.
An SBOM allows organizations to quickly identify components with known vulnerabilities, streamlining the vulnerability management process and expediting response times in case of security flaws. SBOMs have become increasingly important with open-source's increased risks associated with its deployment.
Software Composition Analysis
SCA tools allow software companies to efficiently maintain an inventory of third-party components used in software products from third parties such as commercial or open-source libraries. By tracking which versions of these components exist within software products, these SCA tools enable them to identify which are being utilized and their usage status. Application Security Testing is another essential element of application development and must not be neglected.
Dynamic App Security Testing
DAST is an automated testing framework used by black box testers to execute and inspect code at runtime to detect potential security vulnerabilities and other problems that might exist in applications. DAST can also help organizations conduct large-scale scans which simulate multiple malicious or unexpected test cases and produce reports regarding how it handled each one.
DAST can detect issues related to query strings, scripts, requests, responses, memory leakage, and authentication; cookie handling; session handling are just a few examples of problems it can detect.
Interactive App Security Testing Services
IAST tools utilize SAST and DAST technologies and tools to detect more security vulnerabilities. These dynamic runtime inspection tools run directly on an application server to inspect software at runtime for potential flaws. IAST tools simplify remediation by providing information on the root causes of vulnerabilities and specific lines of code affected.
Mobile Application Security Testing Services
MAST tools employ various approaches to conduct security evaluations on mobile applications. These include static and dynamic analyses and examination of collected forensic data from mobile apps. Organizations often utilize MAST to assess security vulnerabilities and mobile issues like data leakage, jailbreaking, and harmful WiFi networks.
Cloud Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPPs) is a central hub for tools needed to secure cloud native apps. Their capabilities encompass cloud workload protection platforms (CWPP) and Cloud Security Proposition Managers (CSPM), among other powers.
Three Critical Pillars For Application Security
Adequate application security relies on three key pillars.
- Training and process tools available today
- Processes, including policies, principles, and controls
- People who need to be informed and trained on security topics (e.g., phishing prevention).
Triage each section's importance for your business to identify where there may be weaknesses and where there's room for improvement. Each pillar works in concert; all tools, for instance, contain human elements whose quality depends on those using them; humans also think strategically when choosing physical and software security practices when considering tools like these; for more details, please see our 15-point checklist of application security best practices.
Here are a few best practices and suggestions for the three pillars of application security.
Review Your Technology Tools
- Start by creating an integrated set of tools that meets your budget and resource capacity. The most valuable tools are those which provide recommendations. At the same time, humans must act upon them for maximum value to be realized.
- Investigate the capabilities and features of new tools.
- Plan out your device's roadmap. What are their plans, your tooling vision, and can you guarantee they meet the security requirements of your business?
Be Clear About The Process
- Start by creating an integrated set of tools that meets both your budget and resource capacity. The most valuable tools are those which provide recommendations. At the same time, humans must act upon them for maximum value to be realized.
- Investigate the capabilities and features of new tools.
- Plan out your device's roadmap. What are their plans, your tooling vision, and can you guarantee they meet the requirements of your business?
Humans: Embrace Your Role
- Knowledge workers combine security teams and developers. Software must be upgraded just like security teams must do; security is a constantly-evolving field; however, there are plenty of resources, such as training events, that developers can take advantage of to stay abreast of emerging threats and mitigation techniques. Invest in your employees to inform them of upcoming dangers or mitigation techniques.
- Invest in security at all levels, from CEOs to cleaners. Each individual should know and abide by the rules for their protection.
- Foster an inclusive culture by following this maxim: "See It, Say It, Solve It." A problem can only be effectively resolved if brought up first.
Application Security Best Practices
These best practices will enable you to implement application security more effectively.
Assess Threats
You can better assess and combat threats facing your organization by creating a list of sensitive assets. When making this assessment, be mindful of potential methods hackers could employ to compromise a program, current security measures, and whether additional tools or defensive strategies may be needed to safeguard data.
Be realistic when setting expectations about security - hackers still find ways to penetrate even the most secure systems, and it is best, to be honest with yourself regarding how long your team will survive - too aggressive of an approach may mean safety standards are overlooked; taking an incremental approach requires support from employees and customers alike.
Shifting Security Right
Companies are shifting from annual releases of products to regular, weekly, or daily releases. Dynamic Application Security testing must become part of product development rather than being an afterthought if you want it to refrain from interfering with the product release, so make sure it becomes part of the software development lifecycle from the start.
Before initiating any changes, security staff must understand the development process and establish strong working relationships between the development team and security teams. In order to integrate security seamlessly into development projects, security personnel must become familiar with the tools and processes used by developers; this allows developers to embrace security more readily while building trust through seamless security integration into development practices.
Automating security testing of CI/CD pipelines is also essential, enabling developers to quickly resolve any issues after making modifications. Integrating automated tools for security into the process helps facilitate this.
Prioritize Your Remediation Ops
Security threats continue to increase, making it increasingly challenging for developers to resolve them quickly. Prioritization becomes necessary if teams want to ensure their apps' safety, given the project's size and scope.
Prioritization requires conducting a risk evaluation based on severity. This can be accomplished using CVSS ratings or other criteria, such as the operational importance of affected applications. To prioritize effectively, you should determine whether proprietary code uses vulnerable open-source component features; otherwise, its CVSS score remains significant but has no actual risk.
Security Measure Results When Applying Measures on Security
Measuring and reporting on the success of your program are critical components to its success. To gain buy-in from key decision-makers, identify metrics that matter to them and make them accessible and actionable.
Only some metrics need to be presented directly to executives; the goal should be demonstrating compliance with internal policies while showing its effect on decreased vulnerabilities and risks and enhanced application resilience.
Limit Privileges
Systems deemed mission-critical and sensitive must manage privileges effectively. Best practices for application security restrict access to data and applications to only those users who require them at the time they're needed (known as the "least privilege principle"). This principle plays an integral part in security application: (1) to prevent malicious access by attackers (2) for two main reasons
- Hackers may gain entry to accounts with limited privilege, so sensitive systems must remain protected from hacker access.
- Insider threats can be just as deadly as external ones. Bad actors must never be granted more privileges to limit any further damage that might be done.
Want More Information About Our Services? Talk to Our Consultants!
The conclusion of the Article is as follows:
Organizations dealing with sensitive data (such as financial services institutions) must be wary of this threat. Forrester analysts anticipate the application security market to reach $12.9 billion by 2025.
