Contact us anytime to know more - Abhishek P., Founder & CFO CISIN
Software testing should always be your top priority when it comes to software development since software bugs have costly repercussions in today's fast-moving digital sphere. Automated testing services provide further protection. A key aspect of the software development industry, software testing serves to verify that your program functions as intended while offering excellent user experiences, yet improper application can have detrimental ramifications on goals and development speeds.
Software development now relies heavily on test automation as an essential element. Automation often reduces expenses, speeds up release cycles, and enhances testing efficiency. However, automating tests may not always be straightforward, and there can be several QA automation pitfalls when trying it out in practice.
This article covers some of the more prevalent errors encountered during test automation, with examples and solutions to fix them.
What is Automated Testing?
Automated testing refers to using special testing tools to automate different aspects of testing processes. Automated testing can significantly support your business objectives while increasing testing accuracy and uncovering flaws that might otherwise go undetected.
Automated testing services offer many advantages. For instance, various tasks in testing require running test cases repeatedly in order to validate functionality following code modifications or changes; manual tests would need to be created with various goals for reuse in each iteration of testing, but using automated tools allows your team to carry out these repetitive tasks more accurately without human interference. It can complete them faster, thereby eliminating human errors.
Common Test Automation Mistakes
Over-Reliance On User Interface Testing
Employing too much user interface-based testing is an all too often mistake in test automation, due to how user interface changes often cause automated tests to break. Overuse may create fragile and difficult-to-maintain tests that create risky environments for testing teams.
Solution: Merge both user interface (UI)- and API-focused testing approaches into one comprehensive strategy for testing.
As part of Quality Assurance (QA), API testing provides another effective means to protect against such errors. Without over-reliance solely on the user interface (UI), quality assurance (QA) can ensure the app backend is operating as intended by testing APIs - thus making automated tests more dependable and manageable.
Example: Consider that a quality assurance team is testing a web app that requires complex data processing and calculations. To make sure all processes run accurately on the backend, API-based testing is employed, while for front-end display, it utilizes user experience testing (UI-based).
Not Considering The Test Environment
Mistakenly disregarding the test environment is another frequent error in test automation, leading to tests that might work perfectly in one situation not functioning in another and producing false negatives or positives as a result.
Solution: Incorporate test data that accurately represent real-world situations into your analyses.
As part of their QA tests, quality assurance specialists should use test data that represents their production environment to avoid making this error. Doing this means using hardware setups, operating systems, and browsers similar to what exists within production - representative test data allows QA specialists to make sure their tests will function reliably within production settings.
Example: Say, for instance, that a QA team is testing a mobile application. In order to make sure their tests are compatible with all supported devices and operating system versions, they use test data with various hardware configurations and OS versions as test subjects.
Not Validating Test Results
Invalidating test results is another common misstep made when automating tests, often leading to false positives and negatives in results that need debugging.
Solution: Verify test results
Validating test results is key to minimizing mistakes during tests, as it entails discovering any discrepancies between expected and actual results. By validating their tests regularly, quality assurance teams can make sure their systems work as intended.
Example: Assume that a web application is being tested by a quality assurance (QA) team. In doing this, they compare expected and actual data and look out for deviations to validate test results.
Not Maintaining Tests
Failure to maintain tests properly is one of the more frequently committed errors when automating tests, leading to outdated or malfunctioning models becoming outdated or redundant over time.
Solution: Maintain Tests
For maximum effectiveness in quality assurance (QA), maintaining tests is of vital importance in order to avoid this mistake. Retesting them periodically to make sure that their functionality is as intended, updating when software products evolve, and making any needed modifications when updates appear this way, QA professionals can make sure their tests stay relevant and useful by regularly maintaining them.
Example: Assume a software product is updated every two weeks and tested by a quality assurance team, with each update providing updates to tests that need retesting in order to make sure everything is operating as it should be. Every two weeks, they update these tests with any necessary adjustments or retesting in order to make sure everything functions as it should.
Failing To Take Test Data Variances Into Account
Not accounting for variations in test data is another common oversight in test automation that could result in insufficient testing coverage of potential edge cases and scenarios.
Solution: Take data-driven testing as your answer.
Data-driven testing can prevent making this mistake by providing quality assurance specialists with access to an array of test data with various inputs and anticipated outputs. Hence, their tests cover an expansive variety of situations or edge cases.
Example: Assume a quality assurance team is performing testing of a program with multiple user roles such as managers, administrators, and ordinary users. They test scenarios using data-driven testing for each of these user roles by manipulating access levels, permission levels, and input parameters such as access permission levels or data input parameters.
Automating Too Many Tests
Automation offers numerous advantages; however, overdoing it may prove detrimental. Automating too many tests is one of the more frequent errors made when automating tests, often leading to difficult administration and running sessions and possibly producing false positives and false negatives, which require intensive debugging efforts before being resolved.
Solution: Prioritize tests.
Prioritization of testing should take into account their importance and influence on software products in order to avoid this error. High-priority tests should be automated before medium-priority ones and then finally low-priority ones - this way, QA professionals ensure their time isn't being spent automating less important ones and instead prioritizing key ones.
Example: Imagine that a Quality Assurance group was conducting tests of an online store. With regard to testing priorities, payment gateway, shopping cart, and login page tests take priority over those focused on About Us or FAQ pages, which may rank lower on their priority scales.
Not Incorporating Manual Testing
At its core, automation testing should always remain secondary to manual testing for software quality assurance. Certain assessments might prove too intricate or challenging for automation tools to handle efficiently; in these instances, human judgment must take precedence.
Solution: Implement both automated and manual testing together.
Combining manual testing and automated testing in order to avoid making this mistake. Manual tests should cover areas that cannot be adequately covered with automation, while automated testing should provide coverage of repetitive or time-consuming tests.
Example: Assume a mobile application is being tested by a Quality Assurance (QA) team, including more complex scenarios like user flows and interactions with third-party services utilizing both manual testing as well as automated methods, in addition to basic functionality like login/registration testing.
Inadequate Team Training
At your business, involving your team in any decision regarding automated testing solutions is of utmost importance. When adopting these methodologies, cascade the changes through to them and keep everyone updated. When onboarding automated testing tools, it's also crucial that both you and the team members agree. Additional training must also be provided so they may perform and teach other team members about its use.
An effective approach for accomplishing this objective would be providing every team member with an in-depth knowledge of automated testing through training sessions and workshops.
Absence of Monitoring
A supervisory team's duties should go beyond helping implement and monitor automated processes; their responsibilities must also include constantly keeping an eye on these automated systems should any problems arise and taking immediate steps towards rectifying them quickly with workable solutions being found for any challenges presented by automation.
Not Taking Return on Investment Into Account
Making the transition to automated testing involves considerable investment across a number of areas, from setup and implementation costs, selection costs for automation tools, and hiring experienced personnel, all the way to operational expenses and ongoing operational expenses. Therefore, before embarking on this significant transformation, an extensive analysis should be performed first on what the potential return of investment might be before taking this leap forward.
Conclusion
Test automation can be an invaluable asset when used strategically to increase software quality; however, its use requires careful planning and implementation to avoid QA automation errors. Quality assurance (QA) should prioritize testing by considering factors like test environment considerations and validating results before maintaining tests regularly with both automated testing as well as manual or user interface (UI-based tests), thus increasing both efficacy and efficiency with any automated efforts undertaken by their efforts.
