Contact us anytime to know more - Kuldeep K., Founder & CEO CISIN
Security concerns are at the forefront of every corporation's action because data influences the corporate landscape more than ever. It is bad to be unaware of the hazards associated with system vulnerability, regardless of your business. Still, it becomes even more problematic when handling big volumes of customer data. Organizations in the financial, healthcare, and many other sectors must undergo mandatory security certification procedures to demonstrate that they adhere to all applicable industry standards and laws.
However, security checks are usually performed at the end of the delivery lifecycle or even after release, so they are frequently regarded as a deployment bottleneck. These checks are often manual; finding problems requires ops, dev, and test teams to perform unforeseen labor, which can be frustrating and cause delays.
Thankfully, there is a method for reducing security costs without sacrificing system development timeliness or requiring labor-intensive procedures. DevSecOps is the answer. By integrating security into DevOps practices, the aim is to move security "left" to the project's inception, removing any uncertainties about the system's dependability and ensuring a secure Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and end-to-end Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipeline from initiation to completion.
DevSecOps Vs DevOps: Is It A Security Revolution Or Just A Rename?
There are two schools of thought on the name "DevSecOps" and its role within DevOps.First, we require a clear call to action to include security in the software development lifecycle. Many individuals mistakenly believe that "DevOps" refers to development and operations, using the term too literally. Therefore, establishing "DevSecOps" seems like a smart way to emphasize the significance of the security function.
Moving security to the left can occasionally contradict the differences between SecDevOps and DevSecOps. Maybe you're asking yourself, "What?" Are you joking with me? No, in reality, we aren't. The most pressing problem here is how to manage the silos that exist between the DevOps and security teams. Because engineers and developers might only be willing to wait 48 hours while the security team conducts tests in a parallel realm, what compromises can DevSecOps methodologies provide?
DevSecOps: Savior In The Battle Against Deadly Waterfall
When using a traditional development process, like the waterfall model, it is typically impossible to change a project by returning to the earlier stages. The Security Testing Life Cycle (SDLC) ends at this point.
But what effects does this kind of approach have? Serious security flaws were discovered only at the end of the software development process. As a result of the delivery delay, fixing them is expensive for the business owners and difficult for the crew. The agile technique was developed to address this issue. It enables companies to reduce risk when implementing new features. Iterative methods also make it easier to remember security throughout the development process since you can quickly resolve bugs, keep an eye out for cost overruns, or alter requirements early on.
Taking this strategy reduces the possibility that a minor error-like it did with SolarWinds-will snowball and destroy the entire enterprise. According to the corporation, up to 18,000 of its customers installed unsecured upgrades, making them open to attack by hackers. Given that SolarWinds boasts a long list of well-known clients, including Fortune 500 corporations and US government agencies, the circumstances were extremely advantageous for the company and essential for its rivals.
Long-term effects of incorporating security into DevOps:
- Accelerating deployment frequency. Your production deployments grow more frequently the more you understand how to work with security throughout the SDLC, even though it may not seem like it at first. The NIAID case study demonstrates the value of DevSecOps techniques like automated testing and infrastructure-as-code (IaC) in reducing software delivery lead times and fixing severe flaws. However, as is typical, when you change your workflow, things worsen before improving. Because security procedures are being incorporated into previously unaffected stages, the early stages of integration can be problematic. Everyone involved finds it frustrating when delivery speed is also negatively impacted. Who is pleased with a threefold increase in deployment time, after all?As teams work together more effectively to integrate security into the delivery cycle, improve their workflows, and witness the benefits of their efforts, these issues gradually disappear.
- Decreasing time to remediate critical vulnerabilities. Owing to automated security testing in DevSecOps. Error repair is currently manual or, at most, only partially automated in organizations where DevOps or DevSecOps are not integrated into the development lifecycle.
- Easier risk mitigation and flaw prevention. Assigning this duty to a delivery team rather than a centralized security team increases the likelihood that known-vulnerable code won't be pushed into production. As a result, you expedite the process by eliminating a bureaucratic component. You enhance decision-making by depending on members of the delivery team who apply their expertise in the business and technology to make the best choices for the organization and the client. Security problems are discovered sooner when delivery teams share security responsibilities rather than having them isolated within one group. This is because more eyes are scanning the area for any security risks. Fixing a bug discovered during routine maintenance is far more expensive than fixing one found during design.
Want More Information About Our Services? Talk to Our Consultants!
DevSecOps Pipeline In SDLC: Theory Vs Reality
Efficient DevSecOps implementation faces the challenge of seamlessly integrating security into the DevOps pipeline. The GitLab global poll found that 72% of the 4,300 participants rated their safety as strong or good. In nearly a third of organizations (30.73%), security is solely under the control of the security staff. Thus, organizational silos remain a pertinent issue.
Establishing a DevOps security pipeline has two options:
- Using a traditional DevOps pipeline with security checking tools implemented at every stage: Plan - Code Build - Test - Release - Deploy - Operate Monitor.
- Building a DevSecOps pipeline: Threat modeling - Scan - Analyze - Remediate - Monitor.
Building a pipeline with integrated security at the outset is less complicated than adding security checks to an already existing DevOps pipeline since security is taken care of automatically. However, let's face it-before the preproduction phase, very few people give security any thought.
As to the Sonatype poll, 48% of developers acknowledge the significance of security, yet they lack the time to dedicate to it. Not because it's not considered vital, but there are a lot of other matters that hold great business importance and are still pending resolution. How, therefore, does the procedure operate?
All you have when designing a pipeline is what you want it to look like. As a result, you must code and create something as quickly as possible. It indicates that a business owner finances the development, operations, and sales teams. Right now, DevOps security is merely a unicorn viewpoint. For firms, implementing security from the beginning is too expensive. Specialized equipment and experts are needed to set them up. Finding an extra few thousand dollars for security is difficult when you don't know if the product will succeed.
It is very normal to want to ignore security measures when you are entangled in the chaos of looming deadlines and irate coworkers. Years may pass while your programme runs smoothly and you get a good night's sleep, then one day, you wake up to mind-boggling downtime rather than quiet.
Read More: Maximizing Security, Minimizing Risk: How Much Can DevSecOps Save Your Software Development Process?
Safeguarding Your DevOps Pipeline: Crucial Actions For Every Situation
Kind of like a "thanks, Captain Obvious" statement, highlighting the obvious significance of integrating security into DevOps. It is difficult to learn but simple to say. Our objective is to demonstrate how security can be smoothly integrated into the DevOps pipeline without delaying release dates or the deployment cycle and, of course, without using up a significant portion of the project's money.
Perform Risk Assessment And Threat Modeling
With this practice, you will have a deeper awareness of your DevOps security vulnerabilities, asset types and sensitivities, and asset protection strategies. Threat modeling is something you may undertake before switching to DevSecOps. It will give you:
- Inventory of sensitive data
- List of vulnerabilities with possible migration options
- Summary of Potential Attack Scenarios
By removing vulnerabilities from the DevSecOps pipeline and enhancing the security understanding of the development and operations teams, threat modeling helps you accomplish two goals at once. Threat modeling is initially a laborious procedure that slows down deployment. That won't be a problem if you use the right security checking tools and do a prior analysis to determine which kinds of assaults are most likely to occur.
Tools For Assessing The Security Of Your CI/CD Pipeline And SDLC
Automated security testing in DevSecOps stands out as a crucial component for a successful implementation, ensuring comprehensive evaluation of system security throughout the development lifecycle. With it, there will be very little impact on deployment speed. With specially-made tools, you can get a static, dynamic, and interactive security analysis of the CI/CD pipeline.
Specifically, what are these tools?
- SAST (static analysis security testing) software is employed throughout the building phase for white-box security testing, often known as the "developer approach," which verifies the DevOps pipeline's internal security. The software's design, implementation, and underlying framework are all accessible.
- DAST (dynamic analysis security testing) tools are required for "hacker approach" or "black-box" security testing, which verifies the system's defense against outside threats while it is being tested. In this instance, you are not privy to the software's implementation, design, or underlying framework.
- IAST (interactive analysis security testing) operates within the product throughout the QA or testing process, instantly analyzing code for security flaws. It seems like a win-win situation if you monitor security and don't prolong your CI/CD pipeline. But remember that evaluating a codebase or a whole application isn't always a good use for IAST tests. They only examine the things tested by the functional test, allowing you to choose the continuous integration activity and assess its security. IAST tools work best when used in conjunction with QA tests.
Explain why your business needs ongoing security monitoring for DevOps and why implementing security alone for the sake of security is a waste of time and money. Establish your security priorities first, then select the testing tools that best fit your needs and the stages of the DevOps pipeline where you want to apply them.
In any field, DevSecOps automated security testing is important. Still, security is especially important in the following three: finance, healthcare, and politics. Not having downtime is the worst thing to happen to a bank or a medical lab. Data leakage is the cause. For this reason, bank employees could not install unnecessary software on computers.
Additionally, officials are likely to shut down the entire infrastructure until the hack is discovered if a medical laboratory's database is compromised. Customers will therefore not receive the results of their analyses or be able to schedule an appointment for at least a day and a half. Negative reviews are not nearly as dangerous as the possibility of a hacker releasing or exploiting a customer's data against them.
Finding A Deployment Speed-Security Balance
Prioritizing speed-to-market at the expense of other DevSecOps goals puts a lot of value at risk and, more significantly, puts the data of your customers at risk, endangering your entire company. Users will experience consequences due to system unreliability if security is not integrated into your SDLC. Because of this, putting safety first is essential for improving results in general.
Theoretically, straightforward and intelligible methods exist for integrating security into the DevOps pipeline. But reality can set in once you start putting ideas into practice. CIS is prepared to assist you if you have fallen victim to security implementation difficulties.
Want More Information About Our Services? Talk to Our Consultants!
Conclusion
Navigating the digital landscape, the implementation of DevSecOps solutions for data protection becomes crucial for companies. Shifting security left in the project's early stages ensures a secure development cycle. Efficiency requires bridging the gap between DevOps and security teams. By reducing the risks connected to conventional approaches, DevSecOps helps avoid disastrous outcomes. Long-term advantages include better vulnerability repair and more frequent deployments.
Although integrating security into the DevOps pipeline is difficult, automated testing and threat modeling are essential first steps. Constant security monitoring protects vital data while keeping pace with industry needs. Protecting consumer data and ensuring system dependability means balancing security and speed. With the help of companies like CIS, security integration into development processes is made easy.
